It is widely thought in the medical profession that
infections and many diseases are mainly / partly caused by
viruses or bacteria.
In a healthy body, these bacteria are identified by our
immune system that will proceed to manufacture antibodies
to render them harmless. Should our immune system be
deficient in any way because of bad eating habits, negative
emotions / stress or a toxic environment, then these
bacteria will either not be picked up by our immune cells
or an insufficient amount of antibodies will be generated
and disease will develop.
Should the immune system be strong, then we will generate a
sufficient amount of antibodies and after suffering some
symptoms, we should regain health.
For example, fever and red blotches could indicate that we
have contacted measles. Once our body has identified the
disease and generated a sufficient amount of antibodies, we
recover.
Furthermore, our body will keep a copy of the virus and
should it be exposed to the same virus again, it will
quickly respond by manufacturing the required antibodies
and the disease will not get a chance to manifest. Clever
isn't it?
This is called acquired immunity
Artificial immunity
A vaccine is a preparation of viral or bacterial particles
that will mimic the viruses or bacteria responsible for a
disease. It is chemically prepared in a much reduced
potency in order to (supposedly) be safe to inject in the
body. The theory is that once present in the body, the
vaccine will provide artificial immunity and not have the
harmful effect of the disease itself. Good in theory
wouldn't you agree?
According to pharmaceutical companies vaccination is:
* The main reason for the decline of infectious conditions
* The only effective method of eliminating dangerous
infectious conditions
* Harmless when compared to the disease itself
Two snags though:
If the preparation is not diluted enough (or sufficiently
modified), it may generate the disease it is supposed to
prevent in a potentially more virulent form.
If the preparation is too diluted or altered too much, then
the disease may not be recognised and the vaccination
process will have been a complete (and potentially
dangerous) waste of time.
The germ theory accepted by the medical profession is that
of Louis Pasteur. Whereby a disease is introduced into a
body externally.
Antoine Deschamp who inspired Louis Pasteur into this
theory however demonstrated that viruses and bacteria were
already present in normal cells although the body was not
suffering from any disease.
This has been picked up by many Alternative thinkers who
believe, as I do, that the body must first get itself into
a weak state (immune deficient) for any disease to be able
to develop.
Let me give you an example:
Imagine you are in a lift with 10 other people. One of them
has a very bad dose of flu and is sneezing happily. The flu
virus will spread around the enclosed lift. Will all 10
people catch the flu?
Of course not. Maybe 2 or 3 will catch it because their
immune system is low. Possibly another couple may have
minor symptoms and the rest will have no symptoms
whatsoever.
What is the difference between them? Is it because some
have been immunised and others not? Of course not. The
difference is the strength of their immune system.
Have vaccinations helped curb disease?
Governments, pushed by pharmaceutical companies, are keen
to publish statistics that show how effective vaccination
has been. For example, they proudly show the eradication of
tuberculosis (now coming back strongly), smallpox, typhus
and typhoid between 1950 and the late 1960s. Death from
these in 1950 were 1,000 per million of population. What
they forget to show us in what was happening BEFORE the
introduction of vaccination.
Between the years 1860 and 1950 cases of the above disease
had dropped from 6,000 per million of population to just
under 1,000 per million and were well on their way out. A
drop of nearly 85% achieved without any vaccination. This
was due to the progress made in sanitation, hygiene etc..
(statistics from a report presented at the "Presidential
address of the British Association for the advancement of
sciences" By Porter in 1971).
Does vaccination work?
To this day, a vaccine is considered successful if the body
generates antibodies as a result of the vaccination.
But is it effective?
The Salk Polio vaccine was introduced in 1955. Despite
this, the American government claimed that the 61% decrease
in polio cases in 1954 was due to the vaccine!!! (ref: Dr
Bernard Greenberg, Head of the Department of Biostatistics
of the University of North Carolina). Dr Greenberg also
stated that there was an increase of 50% in 1957-8 and 80%
in 1958-9 AFTER the introduction of the mass immunisation
program. Not too impressive would you say.
The very controversial triple vaccine against Measles,
Mumps and Rubella (MMR)has been available since 1975. The
What Doctors Don't Tell You publication however states that
between 1983 and 1990, there has been a 423% increase in
the number of Measles cases. Furthermore, the American
government reported that 80% of the new cases of Measles
had been from vaccinated people! (statistics from the
Centre for Disease Control Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report from 6 June 1986). On 26 March 1987, the New England
Journal of Medicine reported that in 1986 in Corpus Chisti,
Texas, there was an epidemic of Measles and that 99% of the
children affected had been vaccinated against Measles!!! Do
we call this effective or what?
Children who have been vaccinated with MMR can still
develop the disease, but in a much stronger form that can
include liver abnormalities, pneumonia and arthritis (W
James quoted in "Mass Immunisation" by Trevor Gunn).
Can a vaccine cause harm?
A vaccine is injected directly into the bloodstream. Our
natural system of defence such as the skin and liver are
bypassed by this process. Paralysis, brain damage and
Autism have been linked to vaccinations. Doctors who inject
vaccines are aware that on occasion, a person will collapse
and may die or develop serious respiratory problems. They
are train to cope with this eventuality.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) was shown by Dr William
Torch of the Nevada school of medicine to be directly
related to the vaccination of children when two third of
the children who died from SIDS had been injected with
D.T.P. (Diphteria, Pertussin and Tetanus).
A.I.D.S. (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome), is
interestingly more prominent in the seven African states
that have been most vaccinated for smallpox! Is this a
coincidence?
In the UK, doctors are given bonuses when they achieve the
highest percentage of vaccinations. This financial
incentive ensures that vaccination is not going to be
challenged by many.
----------------------------------------------------
Patrick Hamouy teaches Reiki Healing, Indian Head Massage,
Emotional Freedom Therapy (EFT), Anatomy & Physiology,
Oriental Diagnosis & Psychic Development. He sees customers
for consultations.in Macrobiotic, Emotional Freedom Therapy
(EFT) and Removal of toxic products from the home
environment Full information on his web site at:
http://www.therapies.com
No comments:
Post a Comment