I live in Manchester, England. It's a unique city. Apart
from hosting one of the most famous football teams in the
world, and having one of the dampest climates, (although
Seattle is worse, apparently), it also has one of the
strangest attributes in the country: it has clean water. No
fluoride has been added. As most people know, fluoride is a
rare metal that is hard to find in nature, but since the
1960s British families have been entertaining it every day
- in the water that they drink from the tap.
Fluoride is a poison. You're not advised to take a bottle
of it and swallow it, you'd die. However, in small doses,
it's claimed that it has a rare property: it can save your
teeth from decay. Research has shown, or so it is claimed,
that small quantities of fluoride in the water that we
drink can strengthen the enamel in our teeth and prevent
the formation of cavities. Since English children have some
of the worst teeth in the world, anything that can help to
prevent further decay is seen as a good thing, no matter
how outlandish. Because of course, it's a strange plan.
Here's the proposition: we will add something to your water
that is in itself a hazard, but it will avoid an even worse
problem, tooth decay. Who could possibly vote against that?
Manchester did. They've kept the water free of this
metallic additive for almost two generations, while the
rest of the ground has lapped it up, literally. There's
been mixed results.
In the first place, levels of tooth decay in children are
uncomfortably high. Why is that? Are children in Manchester
bad at cleaning their teeth? Don't they realise the
benefits of flossing? Well, that may be so, but not for
want of trying. School nurses regularly lecture the kids on
the best way of using a toothbrush, and if you go into any
primary school in the city, you will see posters and
pictures on the wall of healthy teeth - the aim, after all.
Maybe there's another reason: good advice, in itself,
doesn't work. That's certainly been the attitude in other
parts of the country. We don't want people to have rotten
teeth, they say, so we're going to add fluoride to the
water and the amount of fillings will go down, whether
people want that or that. Of course they want that, you
say! It's obvious! But no, that's not obvious. If you, or
any member of your family wanted to avoid losing your
teeth, the answer is glaring, right in front of your nose:
eat less sweets and chocolate, and brush and clean more
regularly. Why don't people do that? They say they will,
they promise they will, they even resolve to do that, every
New Year, when they make Resolutions for the coming twelve
months. But just like plans to go to the gym, and great
ideas about giving up other self-destructive habits, the
common behaviour is that all the good intentions fall by
the wayside and the bad habits, and unhealthy ways of life,
spring back to the fore in the Spring.
Fluoridation is a good example of doing something FOR
people, even though, in a logical world, they wouldn't need
it. Because, as every parent knows, there are alternatives.
If you agree that fluoride is good for you, you can buy
toothpaste with it built-in. You can then apply the
potential benefits directly to where it is needed, in your
mouth, without involving anyone else in your health binge.
No, we can't seem to simply do that. Somehow we know that
eating sweet things is bad for us, but we still do it. We
know that brushing and flossing is good for our teeth, but
we don't do it. So someone, in this case Local Government,
steps in and says, Right, we can't trust you to do the
right thing. We're going to have to do it for you, (and
take the decision out of your hands). We'll add the stuff
to water, so you can't avoid it. You will now get the
health benefits, (whether you would choose to have them or
not). Yep, that's a great way of treating people like
children, and forcing 'good behaviour' onto the population,
despite all the efforts we make every day to transform
ourselves into overweight, unhealthy, ugly and toothless.
The biggest consequence is that this sort of overbearing
authority removes consequences from people's lives. In a
logical world it would be simple: you eat sweet things,
your teeth fall out. Now it's up to you. You choose. You
eat those candy bars, you'll get false teeth. Your choice.
In our topsy-turvey world, it's all different. Oops, you're
eating that bad stuff. Well, we don't want to step in and
interfere with your decisions. You've decided to eat it,
(despite our good advice), and we can't stop you. Aah, but
we can add stuff to the water you drink. That'll cure you,
whether you change your way of life, or not. You WILL be
healthy.
It's a dangerous step. Once you've added some 'medicine' to
the water supply, there's a precedent for finding reasons
to add more, and more. In the 1960s some people thought it
would be a good idea to add LSD to the reservoirs, because,
hey man, we're all too buttoned up. Let's hang loose, baby.
Uh, no, we disagreed with those wild hippies, at the time,
and since. But in our modern world, there are terrorists
trying to add poison to our water too, because they see it
as a good way to persuade our governments to follow their
manifesto. That seems outrageous, until you realise that
the existing water isn't pure anyway, is it? It's already
been tampered with, in the name of making us better
citizens. The terrorists are perhaps merely following an
example set by our very own leaders.
It's a fluid situation. People will always do the
unexpected, and then, leave the experts confounded. In
recent years, people with lots of money and no sense, have
been paying over the odds for bottled water, convinced by
advertising that tells them that what's in the plastic
bottle will do them a whole world of good. Well, maybe the
fluid has been 'filtered by volcanoes' or 'bottled at
source', (which means it's full of minerals, apparently),
but the important thing is that it isn't tap water. Despite
what all the medicators have been trying to do, they have
been fooled by the ultimate put-down: fashion. Suddenly,
it's just not cool to be seen drinking water out of the tap
- no matter how good it is for you - and sucking out of a
plastic teat is now all the rage in our modern world. Bad
luck, legislators. You're just going to have to find some
new way to do people good. They simply aren't downing the
medicated water supplies you've prescribed for them. Who
could have predicted that?
----------------------------------------------------
Mike Scantlebury is an argumentative Englander. He lives in
Manchester, home of football and modern music, and sends
out books and opinions to the world through his many web
sites. See his download site for extracts, free, then
follow through to order freshly printed paperback books,
delivered to your door.
http://www.mikescantlebury.biz
No comments:
Post a Comment